Cookies

Notice: This website may or may not use or set cookies used by Google Ad-sense or other third party companies. If you do not wish to have cookies downloaded to your computer, please disable cookie use in your browser. Thank You.


.

Wednesday, July 28, 2010

Fallen Soldiers' Families Denied Cash as Insurers Profit

Taken from Bloomberg.com news from an article written by Article by By David Evans July 28, 2010

Makes me sick to my stomach. Greed that is one of the original sins that will be this Country's downfall unless we change course and change course now!


Thanks Royal,...you know who are you brother!


Like $28 billion in 1 million death-benefit accounts managed by insurers -- wasn’t actually sitting in a bank.

It was being held in Prudential’s general corporate account, earning investment income for the insurer. Prudential paid survivors like Lohman 1 percent interest in 2008 on their Alliance Accounts, while it earned a 4.8 percent return on its corporate funds, according to regulatory filings.

“I’m shocked,” says Lohman, breaking into tears as she learns how the Alliance Account works. “It’s a betrayal. It saddens me as an American that a company would stoop so low as to make a profit on the death of a soldier. Is there anything lower than that?”

Millions of bereaved Americans have unwittingly been placed in the same position by their insurance companies. The practice of issuing what they call “checkbooks” to survivors, instead of paying them lump sums, extends well beyond the military.

In the past decade, these so-called retained-asset accounts have become standard operating procedure in an industry that touches virtually every American: There are more than 300 million active life insurance policies in the U.S. , and the industry holds $4.6 trillion in assets, according to the American Council of Life Insurers.

Insurance companies tell survivors that their money is put in a secure account. Neither Prudential nor MetLife Inc., the largest life insurer in the U.S. , segregates death benefits into a separate fund.

Newark, New Jersey-based Prudential, the second-largest life insurer, holds payouts in its own general account, according to regulatory filings.

New York-based MetLife has told survivors in a standard letter: “To help you through what can be a very difficult, emotional and confusing time, we created a settlement option, the Total Control Account Money Market Option. It is guaranteed by MetLife.”

But No FDIC Insurance

The company’s letter omits that the money is in MetLife’s corporate investment account, isn’t in a bank and has no FDIC insurance.

“All guarantees are subject to the financial strength and claims-paying ability of MetLife,” it says.

Both MetLife, which handles insurance for nonmilitary federal employees, and Prudential paid 0.5 percent interest in July to survivors of government workers and soldiers. That’s less than half of the rate available at some banks with accounts insured by the FDIC up to $250,000.

Bank of New York Mellon Corp. handles the paperwork and monthly statements for customers with MetLife “checking accounts.” The insurance company, not the bank, most recently reported holding about $10 billion in death benefits, in 2008.

The “checkbook” system cheats the families of those who die, says Jeffrey Stempel, an insurance law professor at the William S. Boyd School of Law at the University of Nevada , Las Vegas , who wrote ‘Stempel on Insurance Contracts’ (Aspen Publishers, 2009).

Until public officials wake up, the bereaved will remain a secret profit center for the life insurance industry.

To read this exceptionally depressing and upsetting article, please click here

Fallen Soldiers' Families Denied Cash Payout as Insurers Profit

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-07-28/fallen-soldiers-families-denied-cash-payout-as-life-insurers-boost-profit.html


Sunday, July 25, 2010

Nevada Tea Party Pictures

Although long past over and done with, the big Nevada Tea Party rally in Searchlight, Nevada raised its head again, recently when Liberals being pushed to back up tjheir claims of racism in the Tea Party with some evidence mentioned the rally in Nevada andn the rally in Washington D.C. as examples,...however they forgot to provide any evidence, video tape or othrwise, although there is a standing $100,000 offer for any evidence showing racists in the Tea Party. It appears that the Tea Party pretty much polices it's own.

Contrast that with President Obama and his administration suing Arizona over it's version of the Federal Immigration enforcment laws, let allowing municipalities to be "sanctuary" cities, not prosecuting Black Panthers for obvious voter intimidating outside Phildephiea polling places, and other breaches of faith and his oath of office.

The following are my three favorite pictures of the Tea Party Rally in Nevada. Could not decide on one for the signs of the month, so I chose all three.






You Cut Update

Previous Cuts Chosen By the Public under the You Cut Program

Each week, the public votes on which items should be brought to the House Floor. Here is a list of previous winning cuts.....

Week One: Cut the New Non-Reformed Welfare Program ($25 Billion Savings)

Week Two: Eliminate Federal Employee Pay Raise ($30 Billion Savings)

Week Three: Reform Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac ($30 Billion Savings)

Week Four: Sell Excess Federal Property ($15 Billion Savings)

Week Five: Prohibit Hiring New IRS Agents to Enforce Health Care Law ($15 Billion Savings)

Week Six: Taxpayer Subsidized Union Activities ($1.2 Billion Savings)

Week Seven: Prohibit Stimulus Funding for Promotional Signage (Tens of Millions)

Week Eight: Prohibit Sleeper Car Subsidies on Amtrak ($1.2 billion Savings)

This is the cut I voted for this week:

Bipartisan Proposal to Terminate the Advanced Earned Income Tax Credit
Saves $1.1 billion over ten years
On July 20th, four Democrat Congressmen launched a working group to focus on deficit reduction. Among the savings put forward by the lawmakers was endorsement of a proposal advocated by the Administration to terminate the Advanced Earned Income Tax Credit (AEITC) because it "has a high error rate and is not widely utilized by eligible taxpayers." Under the program, eligible taxpayers may receive a portion of their EITC throughout the year in their paychecks. A government audit revealed that some 80 percent of recipients did not comply with at least one program requirement; 20 percent had invalid Social Security numbers and thus may not have been eligible for the credit; 40 percent failed to file the annual tax return required to reconcile the credit; and of the 60 percent of recipients who did file a return, two-thirds misreported the amount received. As a result, this program is particularly susceptible to waste, fraud, and abuse.

Please go to You Cut and make your own vote.