Notice: This website may or may not use or set cookies used by Google Ad-sense or other third party companies. If you do not wish to have cookies downloaded to your computer, please disable cookie use in your browser. Thank You.


Friday, June 29, 2012

Multiple Defeats For President Obama

Wow!  What a week for Obama,...five,....count them five serious incidents, defeats really, for his re-election chances, all which show him to be inept, corrupt or whatever rational you want. 

1.  General Electric is moving, to China.  GE Chairman, Jeff Immelt, is also a Member of the Board of Directors of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York AND the Job Czar that Obama (unconstitutionally) appointed.  Sorry for  Waukesha, Wisconsin......Their biggest employer just moved out. General Electric is planning to move its 115-year-old X-ray division from Waukesha, Wis., to Beijing. In addition to moving the headquarters,the company will invest $2 billion in China and train more than 65 engineers and create six research centers. This is the same GE that made $5.1 billion in the United States last year, but paid no taxes - the same company that employs more people overseas than it does in the United States. So let me get this straight. President Obama appointed GE Chairman Jeff Immelt to head his commission on job creation (job czar). Immelt is supposed to help create jobs. I guess the President forgot to tell him in which country he was supposed to be creating those jobs. Thanks Jeff, you're a "real" American....give Barack our Best!  What a huge embarrasment for the President! If this doesn't show you the total lack of leadership of this President, I don't know what does.

2.  Obama declares "Executive Priviledge" for Fast and Furious evidence.  Attorney General Holder now held in contempt by the whole Congress,...the first time this has happened to an Attorney General.  That in and of itself is a giant embarrasment, but it also means that there has to be something in those documents, that Holder refuses to provide, that links the highest levels of the Administration to the planning, knowledge of ,or cover up of Fast and Furious.  This alone is enough to bring down the Obama Administration,  the People can only stand so much incompetence or corruption.

3.  Talk in the United Nations to ask Obama to return his Nobel Peace Prize.   Contary to all other Nobel Winners, Obama received his prize not for performance but for promises.  People all over the world now recognize what a butt clown he is.

4.  Obamacare ruled CONSTITUTIONAL by the Supreme Court.   With 60% of the American people dead set against this, this will galvanize conservative support.  You think the Republican's make historic gains in Nov 2010?  Wait until Nov 2012!!!  When Romney and a Republican Cogress will oveturn this law.  In the off chance that Romney can't get a majority in the Senate, he'll order his Attorney General to grant obamacare waivers to ALL the states not just the states that Obama used waivers to bribe.  I hope Romney rescinds the waivers that Obama gave to the unions. 

5.  Obama and Holder slaped for their law suit against Arizona's illegal immigration law.  Arizona law enforcement making an investigative stop or a stop under probably cause can question citizenship.  Wait a minute,.....the Obama Administration counters by saying they wonlt run records or pickup illegal aliens now in a "taking my ball and go home move".  Are you kidding me?  Another instance of not doing the job which forced Arizona to develop that law in the first place.   

Thursday, June 28, 2012

Fast & Furious: Botched scandal or Deliberate Effort

As we await the House vote on holding Attorney General Holder on contempt, we located this video of Bill Whittle of Afterburner, who is one heck of a clear and concise speaker. This video is powerful. If it is true, and certainly after Obama declaring Executive Privilege over the Fast and Furious documents, it sure looks that way, this administration has committed a crime of enormous magnitude not only against the U.S. but against Mexico as well. Bill Whittle says: "President Obama personally inserted himself into the Fast & Furious gun walking scandal after he extended executive privilege over certain DOJ documentation. Was the Fast & Furious a botched scandal, or a deliberate effort to undermine the Second Amendment?

Wednesday, June 27, 2012

Allen West's Latest Ad "I'm Just Getting Started"

Retired U.S. Army Lieutenant Colonel and current Congressman Allen West is a straight talker. Representative West (R-FL) is someone who says something that each and everytime you can take to the bank. Although his district would certainly hate to lose him, this is someone he need on the national scene and not just in a cabinent position. Hopefully we'll see him run for the Presidency sooner rather than later. Things are looking good for the existing leadership in Lincoln's party with people like Allen West, Senator Mike Lee (R-UT), Senator Marco Rubio (R-FL), Rep. Paul Ryan (R-WI) and several state governors such as Nikki Hayley (R-SC) and Scott Walker (R-WI). Watch Allen West's latest ad below:

Tuesday, June 26, 2012

Critical Second Amendment Ruling

From the National Rifle Association comes this article:  Critical Second Amendment Ruling--Federal Court Defends Right to Keep and Bear Arms

The United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois ruled this week that it is unconstitutional for Chicago to treat people with non-violent misdemeanor convictions the same as convicted felons.

The NRA-supported case, Gowder v. Chicago, involves plaintiff Shawn Gowder, who was convicted as a first-time offender for mere possession of a firearm in violation of Illinois law in 1995. His misdemeanor record did not block him from getting a state Firearm Owner's Identification card, so he could still legally possess a gun in Illinois. Nonetheless, when Mr. Gowder, who lives in a high crime area of Chicago, began the process to legally acquire a handgun to keep in his home for self-defense (a process required following the McDonald decision), the Chicago police denied his application.

Mr. Gowder sued the city, maintaining that Chicago's law banning non-violent misdemeanants from possessing guns in their homes for self-defense is unconstitutionally vague, and that it violates the Second Amendment. "This ruling sends a powerful message that the Second Amendment cannot be eliminated by a city ordinance," said NRA-ILA Executive Director Chris W. Cox. "This ruling, in its defense of the Second Amendment and its call for clarity on this issue, shines a light on the long-running efforts of the City of Chicago to deny residents the right to keep firearms for self-defense. This ruling is a victory for the people of Chicago and for gun owners everywhere."

Federal District Judge Samuel Der-Yeghiayan found the city's ordinance unconstitutionally vague because it "does not provide a person of ordinary intelligence a reasonable opportunity to know what is prohibited." That's because the ordinance denies permits to persons convicted of "unlawful use of a weapon." But, while Mr. Gowder was convicted under a state law that refers to "unlawful use of a weapon," that law also applies to people who merely possess firearms.

The court also agreed with Mr. Gowder's Second Amendment challenge, finding there was no evidence that Mr. Gowder is "a risky person or embodies the type of violent citizen" not entitled to exercise the right to arms. And, as the court pointed out, non-violent misdemeanants were not historically prohibited from possessing guns, either in 1791 when the Second Amendment was passed, or in 1868 when the Fourteenth Amendment applied the Second Amendment to the states. In a thorough and scholarly analysis, the court made clear that it would reach this same conclusion under any standard of review that might be applied; however, the court rejected an intermediate level of scrutiny for infringements on the core Second Amendment right, holding that those should be subject to the highest level of review.

Other provisions of Chicago's ordinance remain under scrutiny in the NRA-supported case of Benson v. City of Chicago, which is now pending before a different judge in the same court.

"Molon Labe" - "Come and Get Them" has become a motto for law abiding gunowners who would die than give up their guns. For the Molon Labe shirt showing the picture at top, and other Patriot wear, go to

Sunday, June 24, 2012

Obama Orders Military 'Gay Pride' Celebrations

I do not know why this is not getting much press in the legacy mainstream-lamestream, pro-Obama media. You would think the liberals would be "spiking the football" with their degradation of the military and Obama's "victory" in bringing gays into the military mainstream. The only reason this is not highly publicized in the liberal media is that they are concerned with unleashing a backlash in the great majority of the population who would be at least a little inceased at manditory celebration of a deviant lifestyle.

In the military, ethnic pride celebration consists of a day where demonstrations, readings, dances are used to expose serive members to that group. I can see it now for Gay Pride Month celebration where a couple of fairies dance together on a stage.

The best article on this was written by Mark Alexander of the Patriot Post in an article titled: "Obama Orders Military 'Gay Pride' Celebrations - CinC Using Armed Forces for Political Fodder"

Here is just a little of that excellent article.  Please go to Patriot Post and read the entire article.

Just when you thought the Left's campaign of cultural degradation couldn't become any worse, Barack Hussein Obama, ostensibly the Commander in Chief of our Armed Forces, sent down a decree that the Service Branches must celebrate "Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Pride Month."

The purpose of this mandate is to affirm the minuscule number of homosexuals (2-3 percent) serving in the military ranks -- mostly in rear echelon positions. Defense Secretary Leon Panetta dutifully carried out the order, saying, "During Pride Month, and every month, let us celebrate our rich diversity and renew our enduring commitment to equality for all." Obama's declaration came during the same week the DoD announced it would comply with atheist group demands that all military editions of the Bible be removed from Base Exchange centers.

The complainant had prepped a lawsuit based on the errant notion that "separation of church and state" is enshrined in our Constitution. Naturally, the Obama administration accepted their objection without a fight, based upon the Left's adherence to a so-called "living constitution." Apparently, Panetta's "enduring commitment to equality for all" applies to sexual preference but not faith. Oh, wait ... maybe it doesn't even apply to sexual preference. After all, when was the last time any Leftist celebrated "Heterosexual Pride Month"?

Make no mistake, Obama's Gay Political Play is a keystone in the Left's macro agenda to undermine the most critical pillar of Liberty, the family. However, there's nothing "gay" about Gender-Disorientation Pathology, and "affirming homosexuals" in any context not only poses a threat to natural families and good military order, but disregards the welfare of millions who manifest this destructive pathology -- merely using them as political pawns.

Rather than provide one lone opinion about Obama's military "Gay Pride Month" mandate, I asked 20 career military officers, five from each of the service branches, to give me their opinions about this mandate.

While I value the opinions of many young friends who are among the enlisted ranks, I chose to ask officers, in order to provide a more strategic perspective on this issue. The responses I received came from those who ranked from O-2 to O-9.

Each reported that their sentiments were echoed by virtually all of their colleagues. Each agreed to provide their "personal perspective" without attribution, because the military PC police (Lefty lawyers in the JAG and IG offices) are very persistent at prosecuting Obama dissenters, and these respondents expressed an interest in completing their military careers, abiding by their oaths as military officers, and endeavoring to maintain history's best fighting force in defense of Liberty -- despite assaults from the CinC to the contrary.

Friday, June 22, 2012

Liberals Won't Get This

In the day and age of Obama gutting the Military with plans to even further degrade the military, understanding honor and sacrifice is something most Liberal's just will not get, unless that sacrifice is you paying more taxes to support those who don't want to work.

 Watch this video and see if you do not have an emotional response.

Wednesday, June 20, 2012

Democratic Corruption

Congress has something like a 8% approval rate, no wonder based on the corruption cases coming of this legislative body,...and no one can dispute that most of this is squarley on the Democrat,....Pelosi, Rangel, and Frank to name but a very few.   The latest case of Democratic Corruption in the spotlight, to the light of day not from the legacy media but from watch dog groups is the corruption case of Maxine Water (D-CA) that the House Ethics Committee has resumed.  

One of these watchdgo groups is and the following article from their entry on Maxine Waters who is an unapolgetically unethically because that is her particular entitlement.

California Representative Maxine Waters has technically been under investigation for numerous ethical problems for the past three years. However, because Waters has done her damnedest during those three years to exploit as many legal technicalities as possible to try to get the investigation halted, it has dragged on endlessly.

Today, yet another of her excuses ran out of mileage. Maxine Waters The Los Angeles Times reports: The House Ethics Committee put its case against California Congresswoman Maxine Waters back on track Wednesday after finding that her due process rights had not been violated.

In the latest twist in an investigation that has gone on for three years, the committee acknowledged that its staff’s communications with only the Republican committee members during its investigation of Waters, a Democrat from Los Angeles, had “raised concerns about the appearance of staff partisanship.“ It also found that a committee staff member made ”inappropriate” remarks during the investigation. But a review by an outside counsel concluded that none of the actions violated Waters’ due process rights.

With the due-process concern decided, committee members will now await a recommendation from their outside counsel, Washington lawyer Billy Martin, on whether to pursue the case on its merits. Waters, a South Los Angeles political fixture who won election to the state Assembly in 1976 and to Congress in 1990, was to face a rare trial before an ethics panel in 2010, but the hearing was put off to allow for further investigation. Waters has been accused of intervening improperly on behalf of a bank on whose board her husband served and in which he owned stock.

The Los Angeles Times reports: The House Ethics Committee put its case against California Congresswoman Maxine Waters back on track Wednesday after finding that her due process rights had not been violated. In the latest twist in an investigation that has gone on for three years, the committee acknowledged that its staff’s communications with only the Republican committee members during its investigation of Waters, a Democrat from Los Angeles, had “raised concerns about the appearance of staff partisanship.“

It also found that a committee staff member made ”inappropriate” remarks during the investigation. But a review by an outside counsel concluded that none of the actions violated Waters’ due process rights.

With the due-process concern decided, committee members will now await a recommendation from their outside counsel, Washington lawyer Billy Martin, on whether to pursue the case on its merits. Waters, a South Los Angeles political fixture who won election to the state Assembly in 1976 and to Congress in 1990, was to face a rare trial before an ethics panel in 2010, but the hearing was put off to allow for further investigation.

Waters has been accused of intervening improperly on behalf of a bank on whose board her husband served and in which he owned stock. These results are refreshing, but to those who have followed the case, thoroughly unsurprising. Discomfort with Waters’ ethical problems transcends partisanship – indeed, even the liberal organization Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics and Washington (CREW) added Waters to their list of “Most Corrupt Members of Congress” after this particular conflict of interest was disclosed. From their profile on Waters: In the midst of a national financial catastrophe, Rep. Maxine Waters used her position as a senior member of Congress and member of the House Financial Services Committee to prevail upon Treasury officials to meet with OneUnited Bank.

She never disclosed that her husband held stock in the bank. Rep. Waters is an eleven-term member of Congress, representing California’s 35th congressional district. She is a senior member of the House Financial Services Committee. Rep. Waters was included in CREW’s 2005 and2006 Most Corrupt Report for unrelated matters, as well as in the 2009 report for her actions regarding OneUnited. What‘s Waters’ excuse? “The only reason my husband still owns those shares is that no one wants to buy them!”


Sunday, June 17, 2012

Who Is Obama?

Who Is Obama? Nobody knows because his basic entire history, except from what he wants you to know from his books, has been "sealed". Even the most blind and liberal of Obama supporters have to question why Obama's records (and never any other Presidents in history) are sealed and hidden to such a degree. Anyway, Roger Kimball wrote an excellent article for call "Who Is Barack Obama?"

Here is the article from Roger Kimball:

So now Chris Matthews isn’t the only one experiencing a little thrill when he thinks about Barack (omit middle name) Obama. The recent revelation that from the early 1990s until the day before yesterday—or, to be more accurate, until Obama made his decision to run for president—a biographical pamphlet circulated by his literary agents described him as having been “born in Kenya” has been setting the world of Twitter atwitter.

What should we think about that? An agency spokesman who claims to have been responsible for the “born in Kenya” wheeze has publicly said that it was a mistake, a typographical error, a slip of the pen that just went “unchecked” for, um, sixteen-seventeen years. I can understand that. She meant to write “Hawaii” and wrote “Kenya” instead. Could happen to anyone. They look and sound enough alike, don’t they, that no one noticed. You meant to write “there” and you wrote “their” instead. You meant to write “cup” and you wrote “floccinaucinihilipilification” instead. No one—no one at the literary agency, not the author himself—could be expected to notice. You understand that, right? Well, maybe that is an unprofitable line of inquiry.

However it happened, the take-away here is not that Obama was really born in Kenya. As my friend Roger Simon points out in “The Mystery of the Kenyan Birth,” the noteworthy thing is that it is one more puff in the cloud of unknowing that surrounds the president. It’s been pretty foggy in those precincts for some time.

During the 2008 campaign, many of us asked the question: “Who is Barack Obama?” It wasn’t a question that Obama’s official PR firms—The New York Times, CNN, MSNBC, etc.–were interested in , no sirree, but it was a question that some of us pajamas-wearing-bitter-enders asked ourselves when we weren’t snake handling or nuzzling our firearms. It’s a question that has recurred as more and more pieces of the Obama jigsaw puzzle have worked their way loose and exposed little gaps or fissures in the story. The most recent one concerned Ms. Composite, the girlfriend who didn’t exactly exist. But there have been other revelations, or, rather, revelations of non-revelation. Turns out the book filed under “Autobiography” ought to have been filed under “Teen Fantasy,” “Mystery,” or some other rubric in the fiction section.

Since 2008, the meticulous Stanley Kurtz has patiently been sifting through what materials are publicly available to answer the question Who Is Barack Obama? His book Radical-in-Chief: Barack Obama and the Untold Story of American Socialism is essential reading for anyone the least bit curious about the political history and ideological commitments of the most powerful man in the world.

But not everyone shares Mr. Kurtz’s curiosity. At the beginning of the Metaphysics, Aristotle observes than human beings are by nature curious animals: they ask questions and want to know the truth about the world around them. But not all men. One of the great oddnesses of the 2008 campaign was the code of omerta enforced by the the legacy media about anything having to do with Obama’s past. Where was he born? Don’t know, don’t care. What were his college years like? Can’t you move on to something important, like the time Mitt Romney ragged some hippie in high school? Why did Obama say that former Weatherman Bill Ayers was “just a guy in the neighborhood” when he was plainly an important political mentor, if not also the ghostwriter, for the future president? And on and on and on.

There are a lot of questions to be asked about Barack Obama. Why are his college records sealed? Why can’t we see a certified copy of his birth certificate? Why are his medical records sealed? I’ve been told that his Social Security registration was issued by Connecticut, which would be odd, but cannot check because that too is sealed. Obama worked as a lawyer, but we don’t know who he worked for because his client list is sealed. Why is it that Michelle Obama can no longer practice as an attorney? We know the fact but not the reason.

As I say, last time around, general infatuation guaranteed that Obama got more or less a free pass from the legacy media. I suspect there will be much more curiosity as the summer progresses and we get into the campaign. For one thing, the nimbus of inviolability around Obama has been seriously breached. He is no longer the pristine knight come to lower the oceans, fix the economy, and “fundamentally transform” the United States of America into a green paradise where everyone suckles happily at the federal mammary gland except the evil coal producers who are miserable bankrupts.

No, I suspect that even The Washington Post, even The New York Times, will have to take a peek or two under the covers of the tale of this international man of mystery. They’ll more or less have to. Alternative sources of information are much more potent now than they were in 2008. It matters not if The New York Times closes ranks and buries a story. There are too many other instruments of disinterment. The news will out. And the more people know about Barack Obama, the more, I predict, they will wonder how this man became president of the United States. As a first, preliminary spur to curiosity, I share the following image just sent to me by a on the image if you want to see a larger, cleaner copy.

Saturday, June 16, 2012

Over Use of Air Force One

It's hard to believe that CBS actually said something that wasn't flattering to this President! This is from Mark Knoller of CBS.  I am posting this in the shadow of a report that Obama has conducted more fundraisers in this 3+ years of office than the total fundraisers conducted by the last five Presidents.  And we're not even talking about Obama's record setting golf outings!
Air Force One: The pilots and crew of Air Force One are flying more hours than a rookie on a beer run. They are tired of it too, and are adding more crew to Air Force-1, - I know this for a fact because I'm one of the instructors that trains the crews. Our company (Atlas Air) has had the Air Force-1 and E-4 contract for over three years and I've been doing it for about 18 months now. Last year (2011) Obama flew in Air Force One 172 times, almost every other day.

White House officials have been telling reporters in recent days that the Democrat doesn't intend to hang around the White House quite so much in 2012.They explain he wants to get out more around the country because, as everyone knows, that midterm election shellacking had nothing to do with his health care bill, over-spending or other policies, and everything to do with Obama's not adequately explaining himself to his countrymen and women. And with only 288 days remaining in Obama's never ending presidential campaign, the incumbent's travel pace will not likely slacken.

At an Air Force-estimated cost of $181,757 per flight HOUR (not to mention the additional travel costs of Marine One, Secret Service, logistics and local police overtime), that's a lot of frequent flier dollars going into Obama's carbon footprint. $8 Million every time it lands & takes off. We are privy to some of these numbers thanks to CBS' Mark Knoller, a bearded national treasure trove of presidential stats.

According to Knoller's copious notes, during the last year, Obama made 65 domestic trips over 104 days, and six trips to eight countries over 22 days. Not counting six vacation trips over 32 days. He took 196 helicopter trips, signed 203 pieces of legislation and squeezed in 29 rounds of left-handed golf. Obama last year gave 491 speeches, remarks or statements. That's more talking than goes on in some entire families, at least from fatherly mouths.

In fact, even including the 24 days of 2010 that we never saw Obama in public, his speaking works out to about one official utterance every 11 waking hours. Aides indicate the "Real Good Talker" believes we need more. Related: Obama spends nearly half his presidency outside Washington, plans to travel more. Related: Vacationer-in-Chief Spends $1.75 Million to Visit Hawaiian Chums. Obama has spent over $100 million taxpayer dollars flying around in Air Force One, and probably another $100 million on his entourage. Obama is just another tin-pot dictator living lavishly at the expense of his subjects. And we seniors have to "tighten our belts" THANKS TO ALL WHO HELPED PUT THIS GREEDY WINDBAG IN OFFICE!

Thursday, June 14, 2012

Justice Department Protects Illegal Voters in Florida

In a thinly vieled attempt to keep illegal voters on the Florida voting rolls, Holder's Justice Department is now threatening Florida, demanding that Florida Secretary of State stop efforts to purge Florida voting rolls of illegal voters. Think about this! Obama's Justice Department does prosecute Black Militants intimidating Penneslvania voters, because the ones beng intimidated are white, older people mostly voting Republicans, but then they have the plain gall to tell Florida they cannot take illegal voters off their own voting rolls? That's because the vast majority of the illegal Florida voters vote Democrat....who else is going to give them free stuff.

From Yahoo! News reported by Reuters, Reporting By Andrew Stern and Tom Brown (Reuters) -

Florida, a key electoral battleground where the 2000 presidential election was decided by a few hundred ballots, will decide in the coming days whether to heed a Justice Department warning to stop its campaign to purge ineligible voters, a state spokesman said on Saturday. The warning issued this week by the head of the Justice Department's voting section said the effort appeared to violate the 1965 Voting Rights Act, which protects minorities. It demanded a response by Wednesday.

A spokesman for Florida Secretary of State Ken Detzner said the state must make certain that only eligible voters cast ballots. "We have a year-round obligation to ensure the integrity of Florida's elections. We will be responding to (the Justice Department's) concerns next week," Chris Cate said in an email message. Cate said in a subsequent telephone call that the state was still formulating its response.

Polls show Florida will be closely contested between Democratic President Barack Obama and Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney and the outcome could swing the November 6 election. A mere 537 Florida votes decided the 2000 election in favor of Republican George W. Bush over Democrat Al Gore, amid charges from both sides that some people were unable to vote, some votes were uncounted, or were counted incorrectly.

The U.S. Supreme Court ultimately decided the contest in a ruling that halted the recount process. Supporters of Florida's voter scrub, conducted by the administration of Republican Governor Rick Scott, say it is aimed at clearing voter registration rolls of non-citizens. But critics call it part of longstanding Republican efforts to deter minorities and the poor, who tend to vote Democratic, from casting ballots.


In its letter to Detzner on Thursday, the Justice Department also said the effort seemed to violate the 1993 National Voter Registration Act and its rules for maintaining "accurate and current" voter registration lists "in a uniform and non-discriminatory manner." The purge effort, begun in April, compares lists of registered voters with driver's license records that contain information on citizenship.

Critics contend the information can be out of date as many people become citizens after they get their driver's licenses or state IDs. So far the state has identified about 2,700 voters as suspicious and sent them letters demanding they produce proof of citizenship to avoid being stricken from the voter rolls. According to the Miami Herald, Florida's current list of potential non-citizen voters includes many people who are lawful citizens. Of course they are!  They have the welfarechecks to provie it.

 About 58 percent on the list were Hispanics - Florida's largest ethnic immigrant population. And the largest percentage of the illegal population as well.

Whites and Republicans were least likely to face being purged from the rolls, the newspaper said. Civil rights groups say Florida has a long history of voter roll tampering and manipulation. Most recently, in 2000 and 2004, it tried purging convicted felons from the rolls using what were found to be inaccurate lists that kept ballots out of the hands of black voters - who tend to vote Democratic.

Tuesday, June 12, 2012

Real Osama Bin Laden Hit Team

One of my White House contacts,....someone really in the know, sent me this classified photo on the team that hit the compound in Pakistan and killed Osama Bin Laden.


Monday, June 11, 2012

Illegal Aliens Defraud the Taxpayers

WTHR Channel 13 out of Indiana blows the lid off a massive IRS fraud perpetuated by Illegal Aliens but ignored by the IRS and the Obama Administration because they represent votes for Democrats. Watch this video and try to keep from blowing your lid. The IRS is blowing off efforts for reporters to get more facts as the IRS makes their gigantic employee pool unavailable.

Friday, June 8, 2012

Whiny Pro-Union Wisconsin Democrat

I love it when a butt clown exposes their idiocy to the world on national television. In the below CNN video, this whiny, pro re-call, pro union, Anti-Wisconsin Governor Walker Democrat embarrasses himself for all to see, not to mention embarrassing his family for all who know him. It is the age old trick of liberals and leftists ignoring facts and basing their political ideology on emotions. The fact is that Governor Walker took over in a state that was going bankrupt, heavily in debt and within a short period of time, turned that around until the state had a surplus. That's why 40% of the union members voted for Walker - they were voting for common sense and what was right as opposed to voting for the Democrat candidate (what's his name again?) who would return the state back to deficits (just like Obama) for the sake of lining the pockets of Democrat supporters (the union bosses).

Thursday, June 7, 2012

Islam Within Our Society

Kansas bans Islamic law.

Republican Kansas Governor Sam Brownback signed a bill keeping state courts and agencies from using Islamic or other non-U.S. laws when making decisions. Saria, or Islamic law, covers all aspects of Muslim life, including religious obligations and financial dealings.

Opponents of law say that this new law is discriminatory and could void wills or legal contracts between Muslims. Critics also say that is singled out Muslims for ridicule and was unnecessary because American laws prevail on U.S. soil. Yep,...thats what the Brits thought as well as the French. It is projected that in 30 to 35 years, over 50% of the population in these countries will be Muslim.

Supporters said the law will reassure foreigners in Kansas that state laws and the U.S. Constitution would protect them. The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) in Washington denounced the Kansas law and said it is considering legal action. Go ahead and sue Kansas,..too bad you can't use Sharia precedence because Sharia is outlawed in Kansas. Go back to being soley a thinly disguished front group for radical Islamists.

About 20 states have considered similar legislation but the Kansas law is the only one signed in recent weeks. What the heck are all the other States waiting on? "............the governor of Kansas chose to support the growing Islam-phobia in our society......" says CAIR. Oh Yeah? I supposed CAIR thinks that Honor Killings are okay.

Federal courts struck down an Oklahoma law voters approved in 2010 that barred state judges from considering sharia law in making decisions. The court called the law discriminatory. Discriminatory? Are you kidding me? This Country was founded on Christian-Judeo priniciples,.........not the murderous crap most of the Muslim worlds believes. Not only do we have Federal Courts standing up for Sharia in this country, but now we have school children in New York required to learn Arabic.....

New York Public School Requires Arabic Language Studies.

Public School 368, a public elementary school in Manhattan, New York, has implemented a school-wide mandate requiring all students in grades second through fifth to spend two 45-minute sessions each week learning Arabic. The requirement, which begins next school year is suppsedly intended to help the school’s reputation and gain international standing. I wouldn't have a problem with it if they were training these kids to be U.S. Intelligence Analysts or communications intercept technicians, but the Muslim world has brought the U.S. nothing but pain and suffering and we continue to kowtow to these haters who want nothing but our deaths.

Tuesday, June 5, 2012

Wisconsin Votes For Fiscal Sanity

Not only did Wisconsin vote today for fiscal sanity, they voted for common sense over debt ridden state government,...they voted to end the Union hold on tax payer's money. They voted for Republican Governor Scott Walker over Challenger and Milwaukee Mayor Tom Barrett.

At 86% of the vote counted, the race was called in Governor Walker's favor as it wasn't even close.  As you remember, the liberal press had this a close race, about a 5% margin for Walker but well within the margin of error.  Well, better get to ready to re-define those margins of error,...there's another voting reckoning coming u in November 2012. 

President Eisenhower's Prediction

"Some day there is going to be a man sitting in my present chair who has not been raised in the military services and who will have little understanding of where slashes in their estimates can be made with little or no damage. If that should happen while we still have the state of tension that now exists in the world, I shudder to think of what could happen to this country."
~ Dwight D. Eisenhower (1890-1969) 34th American President, Five star General and Supreme Commander of the Allied Forces in Europe during World War II, in a letter to Everett E. Hazlett, August 20th, 1959.

Well, President Eisenhower,...we have already arrived at your prediction. The Presidency for the past 12 out of 20 years has been held by people who disdain military service, and especially with the latest non-serving president, are actively working to gut the military.

Monday, June 4, 2012

Leftists and Egocentrism

 An Editorial from Mark Alexander, Publisher of the The Patriot Post, under the title: Narcissism and Tyranny -- The Consequence of Executive Egocentrism Self Service Masquerading as Public Service

"He that falls in love with himself will have no rivals." --Benjamin Franklin, 1758

If our generation of Patriots is to succeed in our mandate to extend the blessings of American Liberty to our posterity, then we must both know the depth of our devotion to Liberty and understand its enemies. Indeed, we must fully comprehend those adversaries beyond topical categorization by political and other affiliations.

Our nation was founded by Patriots who devoted their lives, fortunes and sacred honor to Liberty for all. They truly understood the nature of "public service" as opposed to "self service," the former defined as the giving of oneself for the greater good as opposed to the latter defined as the taking for oneself to the detriment of anyone or anything else. In our Republican context of governance, the spirit of public service was and remains essential for the advancement of Liberty, while the consequence of self-service has always been irrevocably linked to tyranny.

Our generation of Patriots understands this distinction, and we are steadfast in our fidelity to the higher calling of Liberty. However, this fraternity of dedicated Patriots has always been, and will likely always be, in the minority -- which is to say we must each resolve to give our all. As often noted, Samuel Adams wrote, "It does not take a majority to prevail ... but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brushfires of freedom in the minds of men." In the generations since our founding, Liberty has suffered excessive insult by the rise of men who, under the banner of "public service," are motivated principally by self service -- and the greater the drive toward self service, the greater the threat to Liberty.

Recent history records the ascension of politicians who were incontrovertibly motivated by self service masquerading as public service -- Ted Kennedy, Bill Clinton, Albert Gore, John Kerry and John Edwards, to name a few. All of these men share tragic family histories, which indelibly imprinted them from birth. Each also has a common diagnosis for his behavior: Narcissistic Pathology Disorder (NPD). Understanding this pathology is key to defeating our opponents who manifest it.

By definition, narcissists are deeply insecure and, consequently, have an unrelenting need to be admired by others. Their low self-esteem is often imprinted from early childhood, and for many it is associated with ineffective fathering or worse, parental abandonment. Narcissists have a grandiose sense of self and of entitlement, and they have an excessive dependence upon others for self-definition and self-esteem regulation. Though they may project an image of great confidence, it is nothing more than arrogance pretending to be confidence in a cover-up of their insecurity.

I certainly would not suggest that all children with tragic family histories are destined to develop NPD. But executive offices in both the private and public sector are frequently occupied by those driven by narcissistic pathology, those whose motivation to achieve is characterized by a lust for power and avarice, rooted in broken self esteem and the resulting obsessive need to be accepted by others.

The most malignant form of narcissism is accompanied by intelligence and charisma, which enables the deception of others in order to secure positions of power and influence. No executive in American history has provided a more textbook archetypal case study of Narcissistic Pathology Disorder than Barack Hussein Obama, who embodied the pathology of the Left and successfully deceived the masses with his intelligence and charisma. Notably, he unwittingly outlined this deception in his second autobiographical book, "The Audacity of Hope," writing, "I serve as a blank screen on which people of vastly different political stripes project their own views."

Like all narcissists, however, Obama's life is a lie. To confirm that assertion, one needs look no further than his official White House biography, which begins, "His story is the American story -- values from the heartland, a middle-class upbringing in a strong family..." There is no doubt that Obama wanted, and indeed deserved, that upbringing, but to assert that he had it could not be further from the truth. And to further confirm the audacity of Obama's narcissism, we need only examine his adulteration of the official White House Historical Association biographies of prior presidents, where Obama has inserted his name and some related "achievement" into the historic narratives of presidents dating back to Calvin Coolidge.

For example, the "Did You Know?" section at the end of Coolidge's bio has been altered to read, "On Feb. 22, 1924 Calvin Coolidge became the first president to make a public radio address to the American people. President Coolidge later helped create the Federal Radio Commission, which has now evolved to become the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). President Obama became the first president to hold virtual gatherings and town halls using Twitter, Facebook, Google+, LinkedIn, etc."

See if you can spot the impostor in these other presidential bios: "On August 14, 1935, President Roosevelt signed the Social Security Act. Today the Obama Administration continues to protect seniors and ensure Social Security will be there for future generations."

"President John F. Kennedy famously suggested the American people: 'Ask what you can do for your country.' In 1961, the Peace Corps was created, facilitating service among citizens working toward peace in developing countries. In 2011, President Obama celebrated the 50th anniversary of the Peace Corps with a Presidential Proclamation."

"In 1973, Richard Nixon created The President's Export Council, which was expanded and reconstituted under President Jimmy Carter in 1979. Today the PEC continues to work towards reaching President Obama's goal of doubling the nation's exports by 2014's end."

"President Reagan designated Martin Luther King Jr. Day a national holiday; today the Obama Administration honors this tradition, with the First and Second Families participating in service projects on this day. In a June 28, 1985 speech Reagan called for a fairer tax code, one where a multi-millionaire did not have a lower tax rate than his secretary. Today, President Obama is calling for the same with the Buffett Rule."

"In 2002, President George W. Bush's State of the Union was the first to be live broadcast on the Internet. In 2011 and 2012, President Obama's State of the Union speeches were available in an enhanced live stream version that featured infographics, charts and data side-by-side in real time with the President's speech."

Of this audacious adulteration, Ronald Reagan's former, Ronald Reagan's former Attorney General, Ed Meese, concludes, "What they have done is to spoil the integrity of the historical narrative." In advance of the 2012 election, Obama has framed his tenure in office as "public service." But he is pathologically incapable of serving the public ahead of himself. In order to spoil the integrity of his narrative, we must fully understand his unmitigated narcissism and thoroughly expose the grave threat that his self-interest poses to Essential Liberty.

Pro Deo et Constitutione — Libertas aut Mors
Semper Vigilo, Fortis, Paratus et Fidelis

Saturday, June 2, 2012

Black pastors bash NAACP for endorsing gay marriage

From an article on the Daily Caller by Meagan Clark, "Black pastors bash NAACP for endorsing gay marriage"

The Coalition of African American Pastors (CAAP) announced Tuesday that it does not agree with the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People’s (NAACP) decision to endorse the legalization of same-sex marriage. CAAP launched a petition last week to oppose broadening the legal definition of marriage. The coalition includes leaders of black churches and veteran civil rights leaders who marched with Martin Luther King Jr.

The NAACP voted to endorse same-sex marriage Saturday, and NAACP President Benjamin Jealous publicly endorsed gay marriage Monday. “The NAACP has abandoned its historic responsibility to speak for and safeguard the civil rights movement,” CAAP founder and President William Owens said Tuesday. “We who marched with Rev. King did not march one inch or one mile to promote same-sex marriage.”

Jealous called gay marriage a civil right, and said he believes “it is the responsibility, the history of the NAACP to speak up on the civil rights issues of our times.” CAAP says it believes gay Americans should have equal civil rights, but that it does not believe there should be a right to legally marry someone of the same sex.

On behalf of the coalition, Owens said, “We call on all Americans to respect the legitimate civil rights of gay people to be free from violence, harassment, to vote, to hold jobs.” Owens drew from King’s “Letter From Birmingham Jail” to explain what he believes is the difference between a just and unjust law. According to Owens, a just law is a man-made code that squares with the law of God, and an unjust law is a code that is out of harmony with moral law.

Owens also drew from St. Thomas Aquinas and said, “An unjust law is a human law that is not rooted in eternal law and natural law.” “Same-sex marriage is an attempt to do the opposite of what Rev. King did,” Owens said. “It’s an attempt by men to use political power to declare that an act contrary to God’s law and to the natural law is a civil right.”

CAAP held a press conference last week in Memphis, where King died, to call on President Barack Obama to reconsider his support for gay marriage. “Our only weapons in this fight are the weapons of Rev. King: truth and love and courage,” Owens said.

Friday, June 1, 2012

Yep! Ain't It Just So?

This cartoon clip is about the easiest way to understand the difference between socialism with the bondage that creates and the free market society with self-responsibility annd the fredom to pursue happyness according to your work ethics and initiative.

The full documentary is available at I Want Your Money The full length documentary features great in-depth interviews with economic experts and knowledgeable political figures including: