Democratic Corruption

Congress has something like a 8% approval rate, no wonder based on the corruption cases coming of this legislative body,...and no one can dispute that most of this is squarley on the Democrat,....Pelosi, Rangel, and Frank to name but a very few.   The latest case of Democratic Corruption in the spotlight,..exposed to the light of day not from the legacy media but from watch dog groups is the corruption case of Maxine Water (D-CA) that the House Ethics Committee has resumed.  

One of these watchdgo groups is http://www.crewsmostcorrupt.org/ and the following article from their entry on Maxine Waters who is an unapolgetically unethically because that is her particular entitlement. 

http://www.crewsmostcorrupt.org/mostcorrupt/entry/maxine-waters

California Representative Maxine Waters has technically been under investigation for numerous ethical problems for the past three years. However, because Waters has done her damnedest during those three years to exploit as many legal technicalities as possible to try to get the investigation halted, it has dragged on endlessly.

Today, yet another of her excuses ran out of mileage. Maxine Waters The Los Angeles Times reports: The House Ethics Committee put its case against California Congresswoman Maxine Waters back on track Wednesday after finding that her due process rights had not been violated.

In the latest twist in an investigation that has gone on for three years, the committee acknowledged that its staff’s communications with only the Republican committee members during its investigation of Waters, a Democrat from Los Angeles, had “raised concerns about the appearance of staff partisanship.“ It also found that a committee staff member made ”inappropriate” remarks during the investigation. But a review by an outside counsel concluded that none of the actions violated Waters’ due process rights.

With the due-process concern decided, committee members will now await a recommendation from their outside counsel, Washington lawyer Billy Martin, on whether to pursue the case on its merits. Waters, a South Los Angeles political fixture who won election to the state Assembly in 1976 and to Congress in 1990, was to face a rare trial before an ethics panel in 2010, but the hearing was put off to allow for further investigation. Waters has been accused of intervening improperly on behalf of a bank on whose board her husband served and in which he owned stock.

The Los Angeles Times reports: The House Ethics Committee put its case against California Congresswoman Maxine Waters back on track Wednesday after finding that her due process rights had not been violated. In the latest twist in an investigation that has gone on for three years, the committee acknowledged that its staff’s communications with only the Republican committee members during its investigation of Waters, a Democrat from Los Angeles, had “raised concerns about the appearance of staff partisanship.“

It also found that a committee staff member made ”inappropriate” remarks during the investigation. But a review by an outside counsel concluded that none of the actions violated Waters’ due process rights.

With the due-process concern decided, committee members will now await a recommendation from their outside counsel, Washington lawyer Billy Martin, on whether to pursue the case on its merits. Waters, a South Los Angeles political fixture who won election to the state Assembly in 1976 and to Congress in 1990, was to face a rare trial before an ethics panel in 2010, but the hearing was put off to allow for further investigation.

Waters has been accused of intervening improperly on behalf of a bank on whose board her husband served and in which he owned stock. These results are refreshing, but to those who have followed the case, thoroughly unsurprising. Discomfort with Waters’ ethical problems transcends partisanship – indeed, even the liberal organization Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics and Washington (CREW) added Waters to their list of “Most Corrupt Members of Congress” after this particular conflict of interest was disclosed. From their profile on Waters: In the midst of a national financial catastrophe, Rep. Maxine Waters used her position as a senior member of Congress and member of the House Financial Services Committee to prevail upon Treasury officials to meet with OneUnited Bank.

She never disclosed that her husband held stock in the bank. Rep. Waters is an eleven-term member of Congress, representing California’s 35th congressional district. She is a senior member of the House Financial Services Committee. Rep. Waters was included in CREW’s 2005 and2006 Most Corrupt Report for unrelated matters, as well as in the 2009 report for her actions regarding OneUnited. What‘s Waters’ excuse? “The only reason my husband still owns those shares is that no one wants to buy them!”


 

Only in America

The next time you get into a debate with a Liberal maybe these short facts can help you clearly articulate a reply......before you walk away, because in the end you really cannot argue with someone who cannot use facts nor critical thinking to arrive at a reasonable conclusion.

1) Only in America could politicians talk about the greed of the rich at a $35,000 a plate campaign fund raising event.
2) Only in America could people claim that the government still discriminates against black Americans when we have a black President, a black Attorney General, and roughly 18% of the federal workforce is black. 12% of the population is black.
3) Only in America could we have had the two people most responsible for our tax code, Timothy Geithner, the head of the Treasury Department and Charles Rangel who once ran the Ways and Means Committee, BOTH turn out to be tax cheats who are in favor of higher taxes.
4) Only in America can we have terrorists kill people in the name of Allah and have the media primarily react by fretting that Muslims might be harmed by the backlash.
5) Only in America would we make people who want to legally become American citizens wait for years in their home countries and pay tens of thousands of dollars for the privilege while we discuss letting anyone who sneaks into the country illegally just become American citizens.
6) Only in America could the people who believe in balancing the budget and sticking by the country's Constitution be thought of as "extremists."
7) Only in America could you need to present a driver's license to cash a check or buy alcohol, but not to vote.
8) Only in America could people demand the government investigate whether oil companies are gouging the public because the price of gas went up when the return on equity invested in a major U.S. oil company (Marathon Oil) is less than half of a company making tennis shoes (Nike).
9) Only in America could the government collect more tax dollars from the people than any nation in recorded history, still spend a trillion dollars more than it has per year for total spending of $7 million PER MINUTE, and complain that it doesn't have nearly enough money.
10) Only in America could the rich people who pay 86% of all income taxes be accused of not paying their "fair share" by people who don't pay any income taxes at all.

Only in America,...Damn shame too.