Everywhere we turn or, or more correctly each channel we surf to, is a constant reminder of Obama and the failed leadership of his administration.
Recently, Obama was on TV saying he inherited the greatest economic disaster since the depression,...well, he got half of it right anyway,...the part about it being the greatest economic disaster since the depression. Too easily he forgets the Democratically controlled Congress with their Freddie and Fannie manipulations started this whole mess,...not to mention his spend and tax plans add to the speed of the pending economic crisis.
Pending, I say? Yes, we haven't hit bottom yet. When the Conservatives take control of the House and maybe the Senate this new year. The trick will not be be blamed for the Obama mistakes or in other words, be left holding the bag.
Current polls have likely voters at 51% for the Republicans and 41% for the Democrats. Something like the largest margin for the Republicans since World War II.
Better yet, 39% of the voters want to elect a non-incumbent on both sides of the aisle.
15% would vote for a Non-incumbent Republican
38% would vote for an Incumbent Republican
24% would vote for a Non-incumbent Democrat
16% would vote for an Incumbent Democrat
so this poll has it at 53% favor Republicans and 40% favor Democrats,...Pelosi, Reid, Barney "Mumbles" Frank, Charlie "Tax Cheat" Rangel, and, Al "Let Me Paint You With a Racist Brush" Sharpton are all sweating bullets as they see not only their power but their bank accounts and lavish retirement plans threatened.
Seems like disatisfaction of current seated Democrats outweighs disatisfaction of currently seated Republican. To tell you the truth, I'm greatly disatisfied with the whole lot.
58 days left to Vote. Lets get this Country back on track.
Cookies
Notice: This website may or may not use or set cookies used by Google Ad-sense or other third party companies. If you do not wish to have cookies downloaded to your computer, please disable cookie use in your browser. Thank You.
.
Sunday, September 5, 2010
Saturday, September 4, 2010
Riding For The Brand
I am interrupting the constant reminder of this debacle we call a Government to share this Cowboy Poem:
Riding for the Brand:
An old cowboy and a preacher met on the prairie one day,
One ridin' a buckskin--the other a bay.
They squatted in the shade of a lone cedar tree,
Scratchin' the dirt, contemplatin' you see.
Comparing their lives, and the old cowboy spoke
Of the brands he'd ridden for, and the horses he'd broke
Of the herds he had gathered and held at all cost,
Of hours spent riding when a few were lost.
"You'd give up your life when you rode for the brand,
'Cause of this we buried many a good hand.
But as you can see, I'm well past my prime
And the boss says I'll soon have to draw my time.
What can I do? I'm too tough to cry,
But I'm to old to work and I'm to young to die."
The preacher stirred the dirt with his stick for awhile,
Then looked the old cowboy in the eye with a smile.
And said, "I, too, ride for the brand,
The scars are the nail holes in the palms of His hands.
I've gathered a herd I'm holding for my boss,
And I'm always out looking for those who are lost.
Many have given their lives for this brand,
And we all may be called on to take a stand.
But you're never too old to ride with my crew,
When you sign on here you're made as good as new."
Well, the cowboy that day hired on for a new boss,
And his foreman's the one who died on the cross.
He can ride happy to the end of his days,
'Cause there's no stopping the gatherin' of the lost and the strays.
-Author Unknown-
Riding for the Brand:
An old cowboy and a preacher met on the prairie one day,
One ridin' a buckskin--the other a bay.
They squatted in the shade of a lone cedar tree,
Scratchin' the dirt, contemplatin' you see.
Comparing their lives, and the old cowboy spoke
Of the brands he'd ridden for, and the horses he'd broke
Of the herds he had gathered and held at all cost,
Of hours spent riding when a few were lost.
"You'd give up your life when you rode for the brand,
'Cause of this we buried many a good hand.
But as you can see, I'm well past my prime
And the boss says I'll soon have to draw my time.
What can I do? I'm too tough to cry,
But I'm to old to work and I'm to young to die."
The preacher stirred the dirt with his stick for awhile,
Then looked the old cowboy in the eye with a smile.
And said, "I, too, ride for the brand,
The scars are the nail holes in the palms of His hands.
I've gathered a herd I'm holding for my boss,
And I'm always out looking for those who are lost.
Many have given their lives for this brand,
And we all may be called on to take a stand.
But you're never too old to ride with my crew,
When you sign on here you're made as good as new."
Well, the cowboy that day hired on for a new boss,
And his foreman's the one who died on the cross.
He can ride happy to the end of his days,
'Cause there's no stopping the gatherin' of the lost and the strays.
-Author Unknown-
Friday, September 3, 2010
District Judge Feldman Stands up to Excess Federal Governmental Powers
Judge blocks motion to dismiss lawsuit against deepwater drilling ban
A federal judge on Wednesday denied a motion by the Obama administration to dismiss a lawsuit that aims to block a government-imposed moratorium on deepwater drilling in the Gulf of Mexico.
A six-month moratorium was first issued by Interior Secretary Ken Salazar in May after the April 20 explosion of the drilling rig Deepwater Horizon that killed 11 people and triggered one of the worst environmental disasters in U.S. history.
A group of companies that provide boats and equipment to the offshore drilling industry filed a lawsuit claiming the government has no evidence that existing operations pose a threat to the Gulf and asked the court to declare the moratorium invalid and unenforceable.
U.S. District Court Judge Martin Feldman agreed and overturned the ban in June. Feldman's ruling was upheld on appeal.
A second drilling ban -- set to expire in November -- was issued in July after the injunction was issued.
In the motion to dismiss the suit, the government argued the case should be thrown out because "the first moratorium has been revoked and superseded by a new, second moratorium," adding that the plaintiffs "have only challenged the May 28 moratorium and that directive has been rescinded and lacks any present legal effect."
The plaintiffs, however, argued that the new moratorium "is the functional equivalent of the first one," according to court documents.
In Wednesday's ruling, Feldman -- the same judge in New Orleans, Louisiana -- agreed, writing, "In reality, the new moratorium covers precisely the same rigs and precisely the same deepwater drilling in the Gulf of Mexico as did the first moratorium."
The government has argued that such a ban is needed to "protect communities, coasts, and wildlife" while oil and gas companies implement safety measures to reduce the risks of blowouts and oil spills associated with deepwater drilling.
Critics of the ban say it will only hurt oil and gas workers in the already hard-hit coastal communities where hundreds of jobs have been lost because of the disaster. Cowboys Note: It is not in the Obama nor Liberal DNA to understand jobs, only unemployment benefits extension and other forms of tax payer funding welfare.
A federal judge on Wednesday denied a motion by the Obama administration to dismiss a lawsuit that aims to block a government-imposed moratorium on deepwater drilling in the Gulf of Mexico.
A six-month moratorium was first issued by Interior Secretary Ken Salazar in May after the April 20 explosion of the drilling rig Deepwater Horizon that killed 11 people and triggered one of the worst environmental disasters in U.S. history.
A group of companies that provide boats and equipment to the offshore drilling industry filed a lawsuit claiming the government has no evidence that existing operations pose a threat to the Gulf and asked the court to declare the moratorium invalid and unenforceable.
U.S. District Court Judge Martin Feldman agreed and overturned the ban in June. Feldman's ruling was upheld on appeal.
A second drilling ban -- set to expire in November -- was issued in July after the injunction was issued.
In the motion to dismiss the suit, the government argued the case should be thrown out because "the first moratorium has been revoked and superseded by a new, second moratorium," adding that the plaintiffs "have only challenged the May 28 moratorium and that directive has been rescinded and lacks any present legal effect."
The plaintiffs, however, argued that the new moratorium "is the functional equivalent of the first one," according to court documents.
In Wednesday's ruling, Feldman -- the same judge in New Orleans, Louisiana -- agreed, writing, "In reality, the new moratorium covers precisely the same rigs and precisely the same deepwater drilling in the Gulf of Mexico as did the first moratorium."
The government has argued that such a ban is needed to "protect communities, coasts, and wildlife" while oil and gas companies implement safety measures to reduce the risks of blowouts and oil spills associated with deepwater drilling.
Critics of the ban say it will only hurt oil and gas workers in the already hard-hit coastal communities where hundreds of jobs have been lost because of the disaster. Cowboys Note: It is not in the Obama nor Liberal DNA to understand jobs, only unemployment benefits extension and other forms of tax payer funding welfare.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)