Christine O'Donnell debates Sen Harry Reid's "Pet" Chris Coons and say's that "separation of Church and State" is not in the First Amendment. The crowds gasps and the AP writes an attack piece. The crowd was comprised of so called legal scholars (get a damn job) and law students at Widener University Law School, who showed their collective asses, because they used their "anti-religion liberal interpretation" of the First Amendment rather than what the darn thing says.
The First Amendment states (verbatim): "Congress shall make no laws respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances."
Any idiot, except those in the crowd obviously, can read that there is no separation clause and that the Father's intent was to obvious keep the fledgling U.S. from declaring a National Religion like England (we most of them came from) had. It surely was not intended to keep States and local courts from displaying the Ten Commandants or the prohibition against a Manger Scene on government property during Christmas.
But all that's okay. Keep making us conservatives mad. We'll be sure to express that anger on November 2nd. Maybe some of you Dems and Libs should be buying Nancy Pelosi and gang some cardboard boxes to pack with.
