During a televised meet with Russian President Dmitri Medvedev, on Monday 26 March, President Obama said that he would have “more flexibility” to deal with controversial issues such as missile defense, but incoming Russian President Vladimir Putin needs to give him “space.” What Obama didn't realize was that his microphone was on, transmitting and recorded by the media.
The Conversation:
President Obama: "On all these issues, but particularly missile defense, this, this can be solved but it’s important for him to give me space."
President Medvedev: "Yeah, I understand. I understand your message about space. Space for you."
Obama: "This is my last election. After my election I have more flexibility."
Medvedev: "I understand. I will transmit this information to Vladimir."
Deputy National Security Adviser for strategic communications, Ben Rhodes, explained in circles trying to negate the damage down by Obbama exposing his arrogance, saying words to the effect that "there is room for the U.S. and Russia to reach an accommodation, but there is a lot of rhetoric around this issue in both countries."
Another idiot from the Administration was reported by ABC news as saying "This is a political year in which the Russians just had an election, we’re about to have a presidential and congressional elections — this is not the kind of year in which we’re going to resolve incredibly complicated issue like this. So there’s an advantage to pulling back and letting the technical experts work on this as the president has been saying.”
Maybe Obama did know the microphone was on,...maybe he just can't help boast about his belief that he will be elected again. Maybe there is another plan all together. And all this from a President who believes he can act without Congress.
Cookies
Notice: This website may or may not use or set cookies used by Google Ad-sense or other third party companies. If you do not wish to have cookies downloaded to your computer, please disable cookie use in your browser. Thank You.
.
Thursday, March 29, 2012
Wednesday, March 28, 2012
Texas Woman.....
Texas Woman.....
From the Houston Herald Newspaper.
A Houston Women was arrested, jailed, and charged with manslaughter after shooting a purse snatcher 6 Times in the back as the purse snatcher was trying to make off with this Ladie's purse.
As the woman was called in front of the arraignment Judge, sworn-in, and asked to explain her actions, the verbal exchange occurred something like this:
The woman replied, "I was standing at the corner bus stop for about 15 minutes, waiting for the bus to take me home after work. I am a waitress at a local cafe. I was there alone, so I had my right hand on my pistol in my purse hanging on my left shoulder. All of a sudden I was spun around hard to my left. As I caught my balance, I saw a man running away with my purse. I looked down at my right hand and saw that my fingers were wrapped tightly around my pistol. The next thing I remember is saying out loud, "No Way Punk! You're not stealing my pay check and tips." I raised my right hand, pointed my pistol at the man running away from me with my purse, and started squeezing the trigger of my pistol!
When asked by the arraignment judge, "Why did you shoot the man 6 times?"
The woman replied under oath, "Because, when I pulled the trigger the 7th time, it only went click."
The woman was acquitted of all charges. She was back at work the next day!
That's Gun Control Texas Style and a reason not to mess with Texas Women!
From the Houston Herald Newspaper.
A Houston Women was arrested, jailed, and charged with manslaughter after shooting a purse snatcher 6 Times in the back as the purse snatcher was trying to make off with this Ladie's purse.
As the woman was called in front of the arraignment Judge, sworn-in, and asked to explain her actions, the verbal exchange occurred something like this:
The woman replied, "I was standing at the corner bus stop for about 15 minutes, waiting for the bus to take me home after work. I am a waitress at a local cafe. I was there alone, so I had my right hand on my pistol in my purse hanging on my left shoulder. All of a sudden I was spun around hard to my left. As I caught my balance, I saw a man running away with my purse. I looked down at my right hand and saw that my fingers were wrapped tightly around my pistol. The next thing I remember is saying out loud, "No Way Punk! You're not stealing my pay check and tips." I raised my right hand, pointed my pistol at the man running away from me with my purse, and started squeezing the trigger of my pistol!
When asked by the arraignment judge, "Why did you shoot the man 6 times?"
The woman replied under oath, "Because, when I pulled the trigger the 7th time, it only went click."
The woman was acquitted of all charges. She was back at work the next day!
That's Gun Control Texas Style and a reason not to mess with Texas Women!
Tuesday, March 27, 2012
Obamacare Arguments Continue
With all the news programs analyzing arguments at the Supreme court over Obamacare and with past and present politicians interviewed for their slant on the issue and which direction the Supreme Court will rule, a new low was "achieved" when Fox News interviewed Arlen Specter (D-PA) who of course used to be Arlen Specter (R-PA).
Specter, whose total commitment is to himself, his status and of course his golden benefits from being a U.S. Senator, said that Obamacare was totally legal and justified and that since (he thinks) the Supreme Court is the most politicized court in history, they may rule against Obamacare,..blah, blah, blah.
Here's a hint you old dried up, selfish butt clown of a Senator,......the issue IS NOT what you think is good for the American people - that's an arrogrant position to take anyway,...you and the Dems, who passed this into law without even reading the damn thing, think you know what is best for the American people. That's not your end state anyway. Your goal is to grab power for the central government and turn the population dependent upon the Federal government for simple existence.
Some will argue that the issue pertains to the destructive nature of Obamacare on the economy and business. While this is true, this is a very destructive law, the issue of it's effects on the economy is not a concern for the Supreme Court.
Make no mistake about it, the issue IS the constitutionality of Obamacare……whether the Federal Government can mandate/require the People to purchase a product.....and the Government can leverage a penalty if we don't purchase the product. What's next? Requiring the People to buy a electric car?
Specter, whose total commitment is to himself, his status and of course his golden benefits from being a U.S. Senator, said that Obamacare was totally legal and justified and that since (he thinks) the Supreme Court is the most politicized court in history, they may rule against Obamacare,..blah, blah, blah.
Here's a hint you old dried up, selfish butt clown of a Senator,......the issue IS NOT what you think is good for the American people - that's an arrogrant position to take anyway,...you and the Dems, who passed this into law without even reading the damn thing, think you know what is best for the American people. That's not your end state anyway. Your goal is to grab power for the central government and turn the population dependent upon the Federal government for simple existence.
Some will argue that the issue pertains to the destructive nature of Obamacare on the economy and business. While this is true, this is a very destructive law, the issue of it's effects on the economy is not a concern for the Supreme Court.
Make no mistake about it, the issue IS the constitutionality of Obamacare……whether the Federal Government can mandate/require the People to purchase a product.....and the Government can leverage a penalty if we don't purchase the product. What's next? Requiring the People to buy a electric car?
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
