The Height of Hypocrisy - Targeting Americans

I wonder if Colin Powell, after the Supreme Court hears the case involving Obama's false citizenship documentation and a forged social security card, will re-think his position on supporting Obama,......Nah,...Powell already bought it and is way too deep into the lie. Powell will try and make some type of Republican conspiracy over it.

I wonder why Hillary Clinton gets to skate on her outburst about it "mattering how the deaths of Americans in Benghazi occured." As far as I'm concerned Hillary resigned in disgrace over her failures, which are many. 

I wonder why it is okay for Obama to order the assassination or "kinetic targeting" of US citizens but to use inhanced interrogation (water boarding) under controlled, medically supervised conditions is unacceptable.  The big danger here in targeting Americans without due process,...without a jury trial of your peers..  If the Government can order a murder overseas why can't they do it inside the U.S.?

Nobody can deny that if George Bush was killing US Citizens with an armed drone then he would have been run out of Washington by all the screaming liberals....how telling it is when it is Obama putting out the hit list and you hear nothing but crickets.

All of the above are examples of the Hypocritical Liberals in power and the mainstream media which supports them openly,...not even trying to hide it. It is pathetic and will be the probable downfall of this Nation, unless the overwhelming national debt kills this country first.

Obama May Be In Deep Trouble.....

....with Chief Justice John Roberts, US Supreme Court

An article by Anthony G. Martin - North St. Paul News

According to sources who watch the inner workings of the federal government, a smack-down of Barack Obama by the US Supreme Court may be inevitable.

Ever since Obama assumed the office of President, critics have hammered him on a number of Constitutional issues. Critics have complained that much, if not all of Obama's major initiatives run headlong into Constitutional roadblocks on the power of the federal government. Obama certainly did not help himself in the eyes of the Court when he used the venue of the State of the Union address early in the year to publicly flog the Court over its ruling that the First Amendment grants the right to various organizations to run political ads during the time of an election. The tongue-lashing clearly did not sit well with the Court, as demonstrated by Justice Sam Alito, who publicly shook his head and stated under his breath, 'That's not true,' when Obama told a flat-out lie concerning the Court's ruling.

As it has turned out, this was a watershed moment in the relationship between the executive and the judicial branches of the federal government. Obama publicly declared war on the court, even as he blatantly continued to propose legislation that flies in the face of every known Constitutional principle upon which this nation has stood for over 200 years.

Obama has even identified Chief Justice John Roberts as his number one enemy, that is, apart from Fox News and Rush Limbaugh, Beck, Hannity and so on. And it is no accident that the one swing-vote on the court, Justice Anthony Kennedy, stated recently that he has no intention of retiring until 'Obama is gone.' Apparently, the Court has had enough. The Roberts Court has signaled, in a very subtle manner, of course, that it intends to address the issues about which Obama critics have been screaming to high heaven. A ruling against Obama on any one of these important issues could potentially cripple the Administration. Such a thing would be long overdue.

First, there is ObamaCare, which violates the Constitutional principle barring the federal government from forcing citizens to purchase something. And no, this is not the same thing as states requiring drivers to purchase car insurance, as some of the intellectually-impaired claim. The Constitution limits the FEDERAL government, not state governments, from such things, and further, not everyone has to drive, and thus, a citizen could opt not to purchase car insurance by simply deciding not to drive a vehicle. In the ObamaCare world, however, no citizen can 'opt out.'

Second, sources state that the Roberts court has quietly accepted information concerning discrepancies in Obama's history that raise serious questions about his eligibility for the office of President. The charge goes far beyond the birth certificate issue. This information involves possible fraudulent use of a Social Security number in Connecticut , while Obama was a high school student in Hawaii . ..

And that is only the tip of the iceberg.

Third, several cases involving possible criminal activity, conflicts of interest, and pay-for-play cronyism could potentially land many Administration officials, if not Obama himself, in hot water with the Court. Frankly, in the years this writer has observed politics, nothing comes close to comparing with the rampant corruption of this Administration, not even during the Nixon years. Nixon and the Watergate conspirators look like choirboys compared to the jokers that populate this Administration.

In addition, the Court will eventually be forced to rule on the dreadful decision of the Obama DOJ suing the state of Arizona . That, too, could send the Obama doctrine of open borders to an early grave, given that the Administration refuses to enforce federal law on illegal aliens.

And finally, the biggie that could potentially send the entire house of cards tumbling in a free-fall is the latest revelation concerning the Obama-Holder Department of Justice and its refusal to pursue the New Black Panther Party. The group was caught on tape committing felonies by attempting to intimidate Caucasian voters into staying away from the polls. A whistle-blower who resigned from the DOJ is now charging Holder with the deliberate refusal to pursue cases against Blacks, particularly those who are involved in radical hate-groups, such as the New Black Panthers, who have been caught on tape calling for the murder of white people and their babies. This one is a biggie that could send the entire Administration crumbling--that is, if the Justices have the guts to draw a line in the sand at the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

Obamacare Arguments Continue

With all the news programs analyzing arguments at the Supreme court over Obamacare and with past and present politicians interviewed for their slant on the issue and which direction the Supreme Court will rule, a new low was "achieved" when Fox News interviewed Arlen Specter (D-PA) who of course used to be Arlen Specter (R-PA).

Specter, whose total commitment is to himself, his status and of course his golden benefits from being a U.S. Senator, said that Obamacare was totally legal and justified and that since (he thinks) the Supreme Court is the most politicized court in history, they may rule against Obamacare,..blah, blah, blah.

Here's a hint you old dried up, selfish butt clown of a Senator,......the issue IS NOT what you think is good for the American people - that's an arrogrant position to take anyway,...you and the Dems, who passed this into law without even reading the damn thing, think you know what is best for the American people. That's not your end state anyway. Your goal is to grab power for the central government and turn the population dependent upon the Federal government for simple existence.

Some will argue that the issue pertains to the destructive nature of Obamacare on the economy and business. While this is true, this is a very destructive law, the issue of it's effects on the economy is not a concern for the Supreme Court.

Make no mistake about it, the issue IS the constitutionality of Obamacare……whether the Federal Government can mandate/require the People to purchase a product.....and the Government can leverage a penalty if we don't purchase the product. What's next? Requiring the People to buy a electric car?

Obamacare - Challenged in Court

Today, Monday 26 March, begins the arguments at the Supreme Court on the Constitutionality of Barack Obama’s signature freedom killing legislation. Pro-Constitutionalists and Entitlists both will be watching this very closely. Most predict that in any case the ruling will come from a slim 5-4 majority.

And then of course, no national issue, especially one that is disrediting the democrats so badly would be complete without Nancy Pelosi running her mouth. Nancy’s statement: ”I appreciate my colleague's leadership on helping us honor what our founders put forth in our founding documents, which is life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness,”……..“and that is exactly what the Affordable Care Act helps to guarantee.”

Pelosi continues: ”A healthier life, the liberty to pursue happiness, free of the constraints that lack of health care might provide to a family,”……“if you want to be photographer, a writer, an artist, a musician, you can do so. If you what to start a business, if you want to change jobs, under the Affordable Care Act, you have that liberty to pursue your happiness.”

Well, what can you say about Pelosi? Nobody thinks of her as having cognitive function. She is mostly referred to in terms like village idiot.

All this coming on the heels of Obama trying to take religious freedoms away by mandating religious institutions to provide birth control against their religious and moral objections.

It has been two years since the Democrats crafted the Obamacare law behind close doors then passed this monstrosity without reading it.

The law was quickly challenged by states' attorneys general from multiple states, while congressional Republicans vowed to "repeal and replace" it. The new regulation also galvanized the tea party movement, which was credited with changing the political landscape and driving home a Republican-swinging 2010 midterm election which gave the Republicans a victory of historic proportions.

Of course, Americans being Americans, and having several other more pressing issues such as paying bills (and playing sports) have long since put Obamacare on the back burner, especially since various parts of the law take effect at different times. But that sure did not keep a butt load of organizations from getting “waivers” from the Administration. Mitt Romney had it right when he said as President he would direct his Attorney General to grant a waiver to every state, effectively nullifying Obamacare.

A recent Gallup poll found that only 1 in 7 respondents said they had experienced something positive from the law.

A recent Congressional Budget Office (CBO) report estimated that 5 million people may lose their employer-based insurance between 2019 and 2022. The CBO also found that 2 million fewer uninsured Americans would gain coverage by 2016 than previously thought.

The reason for the front loading of the more benign parts of Obamacare and delay on the more controversial parts was no accident. Obama knows that Americans have short term memories and he wanted to secure a second term before the really asinine parts of Obamacare take effect, plus he doesn’t want a lot of obstacles, nor popular dissent, when he really starts taking away our freedoms.

Lets hope from clarity and the right decision from the Court.

Obamacare Top Item on Supreme Court Term Agenda

Obamacare will be on the agenda in the new Supreme Court term that opens today, setting the stage for one of the most important decisions in decades.

We'll also see cases argued including using Law Enforcement use of GPS tracking devices without a warrant; prisoner rights issues with strip searches in jail; and free speech arguments involving radio broadcasters and television "excited utterances" with expletives.

Additionally, there are several other important cases that may make their way to the Supreme Court including racial set asides for college admissions; homosexual-lesbian adoption rights; Arizona Illegal Immigration law.

The Obama healthcare law, which of course not counting Obama's rapid and historical depletion of this Nation's treasure through gigantic debt spending, is his top signature accomplishment (too bad both "accomplishments" are destroying this nation), and after being ruled unconstitutional in many states, the Supreme Court challenge sets up one of the most important tests of the powers of the Federal
Government vice the states, as well as the U.S. Constitution possibly ever to be decided by the Supreme Court.

note: There are 26 states with lawsuits against the federal government over Obamacare.

The latest pre-Supreme ruling on Obamacare came from U.S. appeals court ruling in Atlanta that struck down the law's mandate that all Americans have health insurance. Of course, Obama's defense is that Congress adopted the law to address a national crisis that put health insurance costs beyond the reach of millions of Americans and denied coverage to millions more. But we know that's a lie. The
Democrats, and the Democrats alone, jammed this bill down the throats of Americans, pushing aside Republicans during the what? 12 hours of analysis before the bill was voted on? Remember Nancy "the babbling idiot" Pelosi saying that "we'll have to sign the bill (and enact it into law), to find out what's in it".

Obama - Kagan Connection

Received this from a reader:

In our Search for the truth department, we find what I have suspected on many occasions. I went to Snopes to check this out and they said it was false and there were no such dockets so I ‘Googled’ the Supreme Court, typed in ‘Obama-Kagan,’ and guess what? Yep you got it. Snopes lied. Everyone of those dockets are there.

Cowboys comment: I have long received information from people claiming a liberal - democratic links to Snopes. I think a prudent man checks each and every instance and doesn't give any one source a free rein with credibility."

So Here is what I wrote to Snopes:
"Referencing the article about Elena Kagan and Barak Obama dockets: The information you have posted stating that there were no such cases as claimed and the examples you gave are blatantly false. I went directly to the Supreme Court’s website, typed in Obama Kagan and immediately came up with all of the dockets that the article made reference to . I have long suspected that you really slant things but this was really shocking. Thank You, I hope you will be much more truthful in the future."

That being said, I’ll bet you didn't know this.

Kagan was representing Obama in all the petitions to prove his citizenship. Now she may help rule on them.

Folks, this is really ugly. Chicago Politics; and the beat goes on and on and on...

Once again the US Senate sold us out! Well, someone figured out why Obama nominated Elana Kagan for the Supreme Court.... Pull up the Supreme Courts website, go to the docket and search for Obama.

She was the Solicitor General for all the suits against him filed with the Supreme Court to show proof of natural born citizenship. He owed her big time. All of the requests were denied of course. They were never heard. It just keeps getting deeper and deeper, doesn't it? The American people mean nothing any longer. It's all about payback time for those who compromised themselves to elect someone that really has no true right to even be there.

You can look up some of these hearings and guess what?? Elana Kagan is the attorney representing Obama!!!

Here are some websites of the Supreme Court Docket. Check out these briefs:
You may have to type in the docket # in the search box of the Supreme Court site.the docket number the the two digit number, hypen, then four digit number in the address.

http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/09-8857.htm%3C


http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/09-6790.htm%3C

http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/09-724.htm


What does all this mean in light of Obama admitting on video that he was born in Kenya? I don't know, but think that this will never get resolved before Obama is defeated in the 2012 elections, and frankly, we have a more pressing issues with the repeal of Obamacare, the defeat of the socialist agenda and the work of the People. Plus, do you really want Joe Biden to be President?