A Soldier's Letter from Afghanistan

I received this from a friend of mine:  "More than 1000 American soldiers have lost their lives in Afghanistan in the last 27 months. This is more than the combined total of the nine years before. Thirty have died in August. The commander in chief is AWOL.

Not a peep although he ordered the White House flag flown at half mast for the Sikhs that were killed. There is a deep disgust, a fury growing in the ranks of the military against the indifferent incompetence of this president. It has taken on a dangerous tone. No one knows what to do about him but the anger runs deep as the deaths continue with no strategic end in sight to the idiocy of this war.

Obama has had 4 years to end this futile insanity during which time he has vacationed, golfed, campaigned and generally ignored the plight of our men and women in uniform. But there is now a movement afoot in the armed services to launch a massive get out the vote drive against this president. Not just current active duty types but the National Guard, Reserves, the retired and all other prior service members. This is no small special interest group but many millions of veterans who can have an enormous impact on the outcome of the November election if they all respond.

The million military retirees in Florida alone could mean an overwhelming victory in that state if they all show up at the polls. It might not keep another one hundred U.S. troops from dying between now and November but a turn out to vote by the military against this heart breaking lack of leadership can make a powerful statement that hastens a change to the indifference of this shallow little man who just lets our soldiers die."

Dad, ...I am fed up. I cannot believe the lack of attention the recent changes in this war is receiving by the media or the country. I think I saw one thing on CNN about the following subject, but I had to dig extensively to find it. The purpose of this letter is to let you know of the garbage that our soldiers are going through right now. With this knowledge, I hope that you take action by writing your congressmen.

First, because of the recent green on blue incidents or "insider threats" as the new buzz phrase dictates, all coalition forces in Afghanistan have completely stopped partnering with the ANA, AUP, and ALP in order to prevent the death of anymore CF casualties by ANSF or Taliban disguised as them. This is also greatly spurred by President Karzi's indifferent attitude and lack of action to take measures to prevent further insider attacks.

Second, because of this massive change in policy (and complete change in mission) all U.S. forces are forbidden to actively patrol their AO and are to remain on their respective COPs/FOBs. There are only a few exceptions to this rule and they all pertain to "hardening" highway 1 in our AO. We have received orders that clearly state that all CF will no longer be allowed to drop air to ground munitions within the country of Afghanistan. This preempts Karzi's announcement that will be made shortly that states the above mentioned order, making it a tactical directive that he is ordering.

To the first point: Our mission in Afghanistan is to partner with the ANSF on all levels. Now the policy makers are telling us that we are not allowed to do that and further more we are to take immediate measures to secure ourselves from the ANSF that are co-located with us. So the question now becomes, what is our mission?

Furthermore, the implication is that we have absolutely no reason to still be in this country if we are not partnering with the ANSF. So why are we here?

To the second point: I don't think that the American citizens would be happy if they knew that their soldiers were being prohibited from defending themselves in any way because of politically driven orders, but that is precisely what is happening in this war right now even as I write this letter.

The soldiers of the U.S. never engage the enemy unless we know that we have will always have the tactical advantage in defending ourselves, that advantage is the use of close air support and air weapons team. To take those weapons away from us is to level the playing field for the enemy and thus exposing our soldiers to more danger. In the school house they teach us that the minimum ratio that we are to engage the enemy with, is a 3:1 ratio.

In other words, we have the highest probability of winning because we don’t fight fair. The sound tactical principles behind this teaching have saved lives. The very presence of aircraft over our foot patrols has also saved lives and now our chain of command is being told by our political leadership that this is now not allowed. If we are not partnering with the ANSF and we are not actively patrolling to prevent our enemies from massing their attacks on our COP and we can’t drop a bomb on the enemy that we have positively identified, than what the hell are we doing here? Give us a mission or send us home.

I honestly have no preference on what the politicians decide, as long as they just make a decision. Of course this will be a terrible inconvenience on the current elections so I am sure we will be forgotten, which really does not seem to be too different for how things have been going for the last eleven years.

Do not buy into what the some media outlets have already said about this. Casually saying that this is a frequent occurrence is false, and is an attempt to downplay the major ramifications for these decisions. We have never been so restricted in defending ourselves as we have now. This is not just a stand down. The other implication of this decision is that we will perhaps never regain our relationship with the ANA after we have executed these measures to protect ourselves from them.

Essentially, we have left them to die as we watch from our high-tech cameras and UAVs. They will not forget this and I fear the relationship will never be the same. I love you very much Dad and I don’t want you to worry about me any more than you already are, but I also know that this has to be brought up, someone has to say something about this. It is wrong to keep this hidden away while American soldiers are under constant threat of death and dying. I don’t care if you send this letter directly, this needs to be known.
Your son,
A soldier in Afghanistan

Benghazi Coverup: The Look on The Face Tells All!

The poster below,...a low blow? Not really when you consider:

• The President not only knew when the Benghazi attacks were happening, but that they were terrorist attacks not a demonstration turned violent,...and he watched the attacks in real time via a Predator video link. 
• Obama lied and Men Died.  Men died several hours to seven hours after first requesting help that would never come.  Obama lied to the American people on television and through press conferences. 
• Within 24 hours after the attacks concluded, Obama was in California hob knobbing with fund raisers, then off to New York to be with his rap star buddies.      

Now we have new information contradicting President Obama's statement that he ordered the military to respond. The Secretary of Defense, Director of the CIA and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs on all together not not getting that order.

Furthermore, Obama has arrested or fired the Africa Command (AFRICOM) Commander General Carter Ham who operational area Libya sat within, AND, has re-called (removed from command) Rear Admiral Charles Gaouette the US Navy Carrier Strike Force Commander off the coast of Libya.

The latest information concerning General Ham and Admiral Gaouette is that that General Ham as head of AFRICOM received the same e-mails the White House received requesting help/support as the attack was taking place. General Ham immediately had a rapid response unit ready and communicated to the Pentagon that he had a unit ready.

General Ham then received the order to stand down. His response was to screw it, he was going to help anyhow. Within 30 seconds to a minute after making the move to respond, his second in command apprehended General Ham and told him that he was now relieved of his command.

The question now is whether the American people will hold to account the chain of command responsible for leaving our people behind, fabricating a politically expedient story, and continuing to sell the now defunct lie(s) even after all of their variations of the story were found to be false and misleading.

A General who made the decision to assist diplomatic and intelligence assets on the ground has been arrested and will likely be retired or worse, while those who ordered the removal of embassy security details and ordered U.S. forces to stand-down are left to go on about their business and likely risk more American lives in the future. source: http://beforeitsnews.com

Additionally, we have learned that Rear Adm. Charles M. Gaouette was replaced a short time after assuming duties whose area of operations just happen to coincide with Libya. So now we have two very senior officers, one a Combatant Commander (AFRICOM Commander GEN Ham), the other in charge of a Carrier Task Force (Rear Adm. Charles M. Gaouette), who would have been able to respond to requests for help from the embassy in Libya, both relieved of their duties.

Obama's Budget,...err,.Non-Budget?

Obama's Budget, an explanation from Ray Stevens.  Keep in mind that Obama did present a budget which received zero,...nada,....zilch,......did I say not even one "yes" vote from Congress?