Obama Orders Military 'Gay Pride' Celebrations

I do not know why this is not getting much press in the legacy mainstream-lamestream, pro-Obama media. You would think the liberals would be "spiking the football" with their degradation of the military and Obama's "victory" in bringing gays into the military mainstream. The only reason this is not highly publicized in the liberal media is that they are concerned with unleashing a backlash in the great majority of the population who would be at least a little inceased at manditory celebration of a deviant lifestyle.

In the military, ethnic pride celebration consists of a day where demonstrations, readings, dances are used to expose serive members to that group. I can see it now for Gay Pride Month celebration where a couple of fairies dance together on a stage.

The best article on this was written by Mark Alexander of the Patriot Post in an article titled: "Obama Orders Military 'Gay Pride' Celebrations - CinC Using Armed Forces for Political Fodder" http://patriotpost.us/alexander/13881

Here is just a little of that excellent article.  Please go to Patriot Post and read the entire article.

Just when you thought the Left's campaign of cultural degradation couldn't become any worse, Barack Hussein Obama, ostensibly the Commander in Chief of our Armed Forces, sent down a decree that the Service Branches must celebrate "Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Pride Month."

The purpose of this mandate is to affirm the minuscule number of homosexuals (2-3 percent) serving in the military ranks -- mostly in rear echelon positions. Defense Secretary Leon Panetta dutifully carried out the order, saying, "During Pride Month, and every month, let us celebrate our rich diversity and renew our enduring commitment to equality for all." Obama's declaration came during the same week the DoD announced it would comply with atheist group demands that all military editions of the Bible be removed from Base Exchange centers.

The complainant had prepped a lawsuit based on the errant notion that "separation of church and state" is enshrined in our Constitution. Naturally, the Obama administration accepted their objection without a fight, based upon the Left's adherence to a so-called "living constitution." Apparently, Panetta's "enduring commitment to equality for all" applies to sexual preference but not faith. Oh, wait ... maybe it doesn't even apply to sexual preference. After all, when was the last time any Leftist celebrated "Heterosexual Pride Month"?

Make no mistake, Obama's Gay Political Play is a keystone in the Left's macro agenda to undermine the most critical pillar of Liberty, the family. However, there's nothing "gay" about Gender-Disorientation Pathology, and "affirming homosexuals" in any context not only poses a threat to natural families and good military order, but disregards the welfare of millions who manifest this destructive pathology -- merely using them as political pawns.

Rather than provide one lone opinion about Obama's military "Gay Pride Month" mandate, I asked 20 career military officers, five from each of the service branches, to give me their opinions about this mandate.

While I value the opinions of many young friends who are among the enlisted ranks, I chose to ask officers, in order to provide a more strategic perspective on this issue. The responses I received came from those who ranked from O-2 to O-9.

Each reported that their sentiments were echoed by virtually all of their colleagues. Each agreed to provide their "personal perspective" without attribution, because the military PC police (Lefty lawyers in the JAG and IG offices) are very persistent at prosecuting Obama dissenters, and these respondents expressed an interest in completing their military careers, abiding by their oaths as military officers, and endeavoring to maintain history's best fighting force in defense of Liberty -- despite assaults from the CinC to the contrary.

Liberals Won't Get This

In the day and age of Obama gutting the Military with plans to even further degrade the military, understanding honor and sacrifice is something most Liberal's just will not get, unless that sacrifice is you paying more taxes to support those who don't want to work.

 Watch this video and see if you do not have an emotional response.

Democratic Corruption

Congress has something like a 8% approval rate, no wonder based on the corruption cases coming of this legislative body,...and no one can dispute that most of this is squarley on the Democrat,....Pelosi, Rangel, and Frank to name but a very few.   The latest case of Democratic Corruption in the spotlight,..exposed to the light of day not from the legacy media but from watch dog groups is the corruption case of Maxine Water (D-CA) that the House Ethics Committee has resumed.  

One of these watchdgo groups is http://www.crewsmostcorrupt.org/ and the following article from their entry on Maxine Waters who is an unapolgetically unethically because that is her particular entitlement. 

http://www.crewsmostcorrupt.org/mostcorrupt/entry/maxine-waters

California Representative Maxine Waters has technically been under investigation for numerous ethical problems for the past three years. However, because Waters has done her damnedest during those three years to exploit as many legal technicalities as possible to try to get the investigation halted, it has dragged on endlessly.

Today, yet another of her excuses ran out of mileage. Maxine Waters The Los Angeles Times reports: The House Ethics Committee put its case against California Congresswoman Maxine Waters back on track Wednesday after finding that her due process rights had not been violated.

In the latest twist in an investigation that has gone on for three years, the committee acknowledged that its staff’s communications with only the Republican committee members during its investigation of Waters, a Democrat from Los Angeles, had “raised concerns about the appearance of staff partisanship.“ It also found that a committee staff member made ”inappropriate” remarks during the investigation. But a review by an outside counsel concluded that none of the actions violated Waters’ due process rights.

With the due-process concern decided, committee members will now await a recommendation from their outside counsel, Washington lawyer Billy Martin, on whether to pursue the case on its merits. Waters, a South Los Angeles political fixture who won election to the state Assembly in 1976 and to Congress in 1990, was to face a rare trial before an ethics panel in 2010, but the hearing was put off to allow for further investigation. Waters has been accused of intervening improperly on behalf of a bank on whose board her husband served and in which he owned stock.

The Los Angeles Times reports: The House Ethics Committee put its case against California Congresswoman Maxine Waters back on track Wednesday after finding that her due process rights had not been violated. In the latest twist in an investigation that has gone on for three years, the committee acknowledged that its staff’s communications with only the Republican committee members during its investigation of Waters, a Democrat from Los Angeles, had “raised concerns about the appearance of staff partisanship.“

It also found that a committee staff member made ”inappropriate” remarks during the investigation. But a review by an outside counsel concluded that none of the actions violated Waters’ due process rights.

With the due-process concern decided, committee members will now await a recommendation from their outside counsel, Washington lawyer Billy Martin, on whether to pursue the case on its merits. Waters, a South Los Angeles political fixture who won election to the state Assembly in 1976 and to Congress in 1990, was to face a rare trial before an ethics panel in 2010, but the hearing was put off to allow for further investigation.

Waters has been accused of intervening improperly on behalf of a bank on whose board her husband served and in which he owned stock. These results are refreshing, but to those who have followed the case, thoroughly unsurprising. Discomfort with Waters’ ethical problems transcends partisanship – indeed, even the liberal organization Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics and Washington (CREW) added Waters to their list of “Most Corrupt Members of Congress” after this particular conflict of interest was disclosed. From their profile on Waters: In the midst of a national financial catastrophe, Rep. Maxine Waters used her position as a senior member of Congress and member of the House Financial Services Committee to prevail upon Treasury officials to meet with OneUnited Bank.

She never disclosed that her husband held stock in the bank. Rep. Waters is an eleven-term member of Congress, representing California’s 35th congressional district. She is a senior member of the House Financial Services Committee. Rep. Waters was included in CREW’s 2005 and2006 Most Corrupt Report for unrelated matters, as well as in the 2009 report for her actions regarding OneUnited. What‘s Waters’ excuse? “The only reason my husband still owns those shares is that no one wants to buy them!”